A sad but familiar tale; little known player signs for big club, fans of club get over-excited, player performs well early in his career, hype grows out of control, chants are sung lauding his brilliance, then the progress tails off, player finds it harder and harder to reach the standards he achieved in the early period, fans become disheartened at the demise, years go by with a series of false starts, player completes transition great hope to regular punchline.
Anderson has long been a divisive figure amongst Reds. His acolytes point to the unforeseen injuries and mishandling by the manager; his critics condemn his lifestyle choices as making him susceptible to injury and lament his inconsistent performances restricting his runs in the side. It is a back-and-forth argument which is never far away from any pre-season debate – particularly whilst midfield vulnerability continues to be the cause of such anxiety amongst supporters.
I’m not looking to settle this debate – Colin Millar has shared his thoughts recently on this site and I gave my own view last summer which I’ve had little cause to change – but my question is whether this debate is healthy?
The anticipated signing to improve our central midfield as yet has not arrived. The volume of games we hope to participate in means relying on our veterans to see us through the season is not an option. The reality is that based on current personnel Anderson will be a factor in any ambitions we have for the season ahead. If then the response to his inclusion in the side is derision and mockery from fans then can we legitimately expect him to prosper? It might also be argued that a professional, whose wealth and success to some extent originates from the ticket-buyigng public, should be made aware when he fails to meet the expected standards of the supporters. Perhaps the protected, utopian bubble in which the modern footballer exists is a contributing factor to underachievement?

Anderson’s early displays against Fabregas earned him cult status.
I think we should give him more chance.Iam sure the lad will come good at the end.Some times he shows glimses of what he can do.He was only unlucky last season to have that injury,he was one of our best four players in the early stage of last season.Paul Scholes wouldn't have come back if Anderson didn't have injury.So we should give him another oportunity.
No we don't neet luca or lucas we neet our yongsters
Hi I see evry1 see anderson as flop but he is man united best midfilder en cleverly ok y do united play show shit becos carick is the problime en scols en gigs en rio f rite now in our midfild can u tell me anderson cleverly kagwa wit nani vlencia en wellbeck wat wil our team be like dan dy can bring city sel c evry1 we will fuck them up
Anderson is a good player but not for MU. We thank him but he has to leave MU. Because Mu wants a player like Luca Modrich or Lucas (the new Brazilian starlet)
© © 2010- 2012 Can They Score. All Rights Reserved.
I think we should give him more chance because he has good midfield ability although injury has not give him chance to excel let's give him one more season to prove his ability