By Steve Williams
Tall, two-footed, great first touch, fantastic range of passing, positionally exceptional, and does a fantastic job of screening the back four.
If you said that list of attributes to any club manager in world football they would be screaming at you demanding to find out who he is, yet because his name happens to be “Michael Carrick”, he is unbelievably underrated.
The sheer fact that the majority of English fans, and even a large number of United fans, question his ability and value to the team genuinely astounds me. Sir Alex Ferguson paid £18m for his services, picks him on a regular basis and starts him in two Champions League finals against arguably the greatest club side of all time. Surely this is reason enough to quell any doubts over his quality as a player?
Any player who makes over 300 Premier League appearances, in addition to 50 in the Champions League, surely deserves more credit. He may not be as quick as Iniesta, as strong as Essien or as potent as Sneijder but his reading of the game and his intelligence on where to position himself both with and without possession is as good as any in the game.
Many so-called United fans prefer to criticise Carrick for his lack of bite and drive but for me that is what sets him apart from other midfielders. So many times you will see the likes of Steven Gerrard or Scott Parker go flying into a tackle by the sidelines, throwing themselves at the ball to only give away a foul or result in putting the ball out of play and the crowed drools over their “manliness”.
Carrick, however, will just nonchalantly jockey the player, stick a foot in and regain possession or just simply stop that player from advancing further down the pitch. The end effect is the same, if not better, yet because the stereotypical English player would use more aggression it is unfairly seen as a weakness in his game.
For years, people have been saying how the Brazilians, Spaniards and Portuguese are far more technically gifted and how we need that style of play in the English game yet they seem to overlook Carrick time and time again, as shown when the likes of Lampard, Gerrard and Barry have been picked over him for the National side. This thrills me because England’s loss is most definitely United’s gain!
I believe Carrick could even play for the likes of Barcelona, he has the vision and passing range of his Spanish counterparts such as Xavi and Xabi Alonso – you never see those two criticised for not making crunching challenges or not scoring enough goals. It is the typical narrow-mindedness of the English supporter to pigeonhole every central midfielder as having the same role, despite the fact the game has developed so far that we now have defensive midfielders, box-to-box players, midfield destroyers used to break up play, the free-role for flair players etc. Therefore you cannot compare the likes of Carrick, Gerrard, Pastore, Gattuso in one category and slate him for not having some of the qualities of those types of players!
If you watch the way United play, many times our centre-backs will have possession and Carrick will ALWAYS be available for a pass, many times he will just pass the ball to the other centre-back to create a triangle, yet this is so effective as it is making the opposing striker do a lot of shutting down and also drawing the opposition team further up the field and creating spaces for the more advanced players to move into. This is something most Carrick-haters won’t see as they are too impatient and blinkered to understand the job he is doing – I can imagine Sir Alex encourages this style of play as many teams play deep against us, especially at Old Trafford.
It is sometimes said that Carrick shirks the defensive duties yet he just goes about his business in a different style, screening the back four so that the ball cannot be played into the strikers feet and reducing the amount of space a player who plays “in the hole” has to work with, such as a David Silva. A few seasons back, when United played Inter in the Champions League, the Italian press marvelled at his performance the next day, referring to him as “Magnifico” and labelling his style of play as perfectly Italian. Not bad for a player who supposedly ‘hides against the big sides’ and ‘always gives the ball away’.
The modern game heavily relies on ball retention, and having the ability to not always look for the Hollywood ball but to keep the other team chasing the ball and patiently waiting for the right time to slip through that killer pass. It may not be Carrick that eventually makes that pass but you can guarantee he’s been involved in the basic build-up play prior to it being played.
Michael Carrick just goes about his business quietly, doesn’t moan about being left out of the side, is never in the tabloids for the wrong reasons and is an extremely consistent player. I think his class almost sets him up for a downfall as he rarely makes a mistake but when he does it’s jumped on by fans and press alike. I have never, and will never criticise a player who plays the game as it should be played, and loves playing for United. This is why Michael Carrick is my favourite footballer.
Writen by Steve Williams.
Carrick is calmness personified. Sometimes, too calm for his own good. But having a reliable midfielder like Carrick is perfect for the wingbacks, giving them freedom to bomb forward. He rarely gives the ball away.
His positioning is always excellent. He is always available to receive the pass, and then lay it off. I like to call it metronomic passing. And it may not be flashy like that of Scholes', but it is highly effective in keeping possession. Also, he doesn't dive into tackles because he doesn't need to, he is almost always in the right position to steal the ball, whether through an interception or just by stealing it from under their feet.
One thing I think Carrick is guilty of is being too lackadaisical at times. Not enough effort in tracking an opponent every so often, and they get a chance at goal. Not enough effort going forward, and we lose possession through a long shot or a stray pass, largely due to not having enough bodies forward.
One thing I will disagree with in the article is this: "starts him in two Champions League finals against arguably the greatest club side of all time. Surely this is reason enough to quell any doubts over his quality as a player?"
The reason I say this is, his midfield partner in both of these finals was Ryan Giggs, and, for me, Giggsy simply isn't good enough anymore at the highest level.
What I am not saying here is that Carrick isn't that good, because personally I think he is. I just think you have worded that slightly incorrectly.
The thing is with those finals is that Carrick has been blamed for the midfield being overrun (overrun by possibly the best midfield of all time), yet Giggsy doesn't receive much of the blame. If Carrick had had a better partner/s, I think it's safe to say that we would have performed better.
Carrick has successful pass rate cos all he does is pass backwards! surely no one would miss by passing safely backwards to his defenders! see this is a false statistic in this particular case, passing forward successfully would be something to appreciate though!
I agree with you however that he wouldn't get into to Barcelona's team. Busquets does that job for them and he does it better than Carrick ever could. Yet a lot of fans weren't convinced by him (outside Barcelona) until they realised he was a bonifide regular and soon commanded a place in Spain's national side ahead of Xabi Alonso, who most would've argued is better. But it's ability to perffectly complement the more talented players that makes him such an asset.
Similarly, Carrick has a role, and more importantly, he knows it. That article explains that there is not that many box-to-box players who do everything anymore. Football has evolved and advanced to the point where specialist are needed, not the jack-of-all trades, master of none types. I don't think you took in that part.
Nobody is claiming, or would claim that Carrick is an amazing player. This article simply highlights the things he does do, and does quite well. Nobody can really argue against that. He actually does those things, even though some people don't notice it.
As far what teams he would get into. He would get into most Italian sides, though Milan have van Bommel, a destroyer, Juve have Pirlo, a deep-lying creator and Marchisio, similar to Carrick but more attack-minded (I wouldn't mind seeing us sign him) Inter have Cambiasso, a destroyer.. it's ridiculous to suggest that means he's no use. They simply already have players that fill Carrick's position, and some do it in a way that they feel suits them more. That is all besides the point though, it's not a game of top trumps we're playing here.
His passing range is fairly good, his execution however isn't on a par with the best in his position. His defensive qualities are what stands out the most. The part that says his positional sense and game-reading being as good as any is absolutely bang on. This is reinforced by the amount of interceptions he makes every game (most of any midfielder in the PL last season) and he had the highest succes rate for tackles of any midfielder in our side.
All the stats are in his favour, not that stats explain everything, but they highlight things fans don't have the capacity to take in in real time, counting passes, tackles and the successful ones etc. We win more often with him in the side than when he's not, we let in less goals with him in the side, we surrender less chances when he's in the side.
He does have weaknesses though of course. He's not very quick on his feet, he's not aggressive, he can't carry the ball as well as some others. But while some players let that get in the way of their gameplay, Carrick knows his limits and finds a way to still perform to a high level and command a place in one of the best teams in the world quite regularly. If he was as poor as a lot fans think, he wouldn't be in the side now would he?
He is poor, and our midfield is really poor thats why he finds a place in it! Its not like we have any better midfielders, its a poor choice between himself, Fletcher (whom also lost his form), Anderson (mr inconsistent), & last year the retarded Gibson! so…actually a disabled kid would easily find his way in this midfield! & the midfield performs like crap every game, and their scoring record & assist record is poor, and incomparable to any of the top teams midfields, and btw, this season, Carrick cant break into the team FYI (even though Cleverly is injured) !
I have a feeling that's gonna change now!
Not even on the bench against Aldershot last night. He's starting against Everton this weekend, you better believe it!!
Sorry mate, you are badly mistaken, by modern standards Carrick is poor and would never play in any of the other top sides in the prem, nor would he play in the midfield of ANY Spanish side, would he get in to AC midfiled or even Inter or Juve, dont think so. What about the top German sides………nope could not see it, France erm……..maybe but they are French remember and the white flag comes out pretty quick in france. In fact I would probably put my mortgage on the fact he would never get into any of the top 20 teams in euroland other than UTD and would be so far down the pecking order for England I guarantee Owen Hargreaves is ahead of him. I am not a Carrick hater btw passing the ball back to a centre half after recieving it from the other cantre half is not the UTD way and I pray to god that it never is, as you say Carrick does this exceptionally well and his positioning on the pitch is what i would call hiding as he has lost a lot of confidence, trust me when we play weaker teams you will see him get forward and have the odd shot at goal.
Unfortunatley Carrick must be let go…………………….:(
"trust me when we play weaker teams you will see him get forward and have the odd shot at goal."
So would you say the same for Fergie's confidence in his players when we play a good European side and we play 4-5-1 and don't go as gung-ho as when we play a weaker side?!
The fact is all players and management are more confident in their style when they play weaker teams. And when Carrick is up against a good side that can pose a threat, it's absolutely imperitive that he doesn't roam forward at every opportunity because his primary role as a player is to shield the defence, play simple passes and do what a holding midfielder does.
Most fans will swear Fletcher or even Anderson are much better than Carrick (more talented maybe, but insofar as knowing their limits and playing within them, no chance!), but it was evident in yesterday's game that they lacked the basic defensive nous of Carrick. In fact we've surrendered around 20 shots in EVERY game this season (Carrick not involved in any), we just finally came up against a side that could punish us. Chelsea could've beaten us if they had been clinical enough. In fact just Torres and Ramires' shocking efforts turning into merely acceptable efforts would've earned them a draw, but I suppose nobody cares about these things when we win. The problems have been there all season if you ask me, masked by our superb forward play.
You will never see us let teams get in behind us so easily with Carrick in the side. In fact I was in dismay that we had been so poor defensively this season.. but great attacking play hides that from most fans. Look at Phil Jones, he's been the main problem if you ask me, but he's been excellent going forward so everyone assumes he's been brilliant. That just sums up in a nutshell the range of what most fans actually see.
As soon as he was put in midfield against Liverpool, his defensive weaknesses were there for everyone to see.
I suspect Carrick will be a regular again just as he was last season. Especially in the Champions League where tactics and tactically aware players are so very important.
Fletcher and or Anderson are not much better, Phil jones was thrust into midfield in the Liverpool game wrongly as he needs more experience. Answer me this would he get into any other top side in europe, as the great Cantona called Dechamps, Carrick is a water carrier on problem is he spills far to much to be even that. Regarding getting forward all other midfielders will try to link with the forwards in every game not just against the weaker teams. Im sorry but i really can not see how he can be your favorite player unless you are in fact Michaels brother or mum!!! For me he is very average at best and is squad material rather than first choice, give me Scholes back please!!
He's not my favourite player at all.. I just think he deserves more credit for what he does do and less stick for the overall failings of the midfield, let's be honest, it's always him.. "The midfield was crap today, ugh Carrick has to go"
I'm more of a Berbatov/Nani fan tbh.. And Scholes well I can't argue there, he's my favourite player ever, but let's be honest, he was no longer that same player last season.. Too slow and had a harder time dealing with high-tempo games than even Carrick!
That's a pretty apt comparison with Deschamps, he was in no way a great talented player but he was an integral part of a side that won the World Cup. And a damn good side that was too!
I don't get the "he spills too much" part… he really doesn't.. It's because of the deeper position he plays in that it's more noticable. He could give the ball away 3-4 times in a game, not bad, and fans will jump on it because in that area it usually results in the opposition getting a chance on goal. Whilst the likes of Giggs, Anderson and Fletcher give it away more often, sometimes 10-15 times per game, but because they play a telling forward pass in there too, people forget the numerous time they do give the ball away (many times it doesn't end up in a chance for opponents because the players behind, Carrick included, mop up their mess)
Giggs is notorious for it, he'll give it away all game but get an assist, and an 8/10 rating from most. It's disgusting, while Carrick can make a grand total of 4 mistakes and still get hammered. It's an embarrassment to be quite honest.
Absolutely spot on.
fantastic blog, good to see some fans appreciate what he does
Since when did most of the United fans become this mediocre and less ambitious than ever!! Im not saying Carrick is shit, but surely by the standards we are used too (Roy Keane & Paul Scholes) our midfielders suck! Carrick wouldnt fit to tie Roy Keane's laces, and neither does any of the others! just put it this way. We need an attacking midfielder just like Scholes in his prime & A holding one or a defensive one just like Keano in his prime too. end of story enough mediocrity for crying out loud
David De Gea isn't as good as Peter Schmeichel
Anders Lindegaard isn't as good as Edwin van der Sar
Chris Smalling isn't as good as Steve Bruce
Phil Jones isn't as good as Bill Foulkes
Rafael Da Silva isn't as good as Gary Neville
Fabio Da Silva isn't as good as Denis Irwin
Rio Ferdinand isn't as good as Gary Pallister
Patrice Evra isn't as good as Tony Dunne
Ashley Young isn't as good as George Best
Park Ji Sung isn't as good as David Beckham
Antonio Valencia isn't as good as Billy Meredith
Luis Nani isn't as good as Cristiano Ronaldo
Darren Fletcher isn't as good as Bobby Charlton
Danny Welbeck isn't as good as Tommy Taylor
Javier Hernandez isn't as good as Denis Law
Federico Macheda isn't as good as Dwight Yorke
Michael Owen isn't as good as Louis Saha
Do you have a point, Mr Anonymous? Because my point here is proving how moronic you are.
Haha get in.. I don't see the point in comparing present players to past players at all.
I mean is my memory bad or did Keane for the last 4-5 years of his career not just pass it to Scholes all the time. Backwards, sideways, a little bit forward. Not roaming forward like he used to in the 90's?
His influence was massive, he was one of, if not the greatest captain ever and he made sure the others put in the effort he thought they should. But he didn't exactly stand out football-wise, he just played simple, it's in the job description.
I think fans are as dissapointed that Carrick or none of the other midfielders have that influence as much as anything else. But influential characters like that are rare enough. We have influential players still, not in midfield though, and they just do it in a more eh.. sane way!
I think we should sign Modric by the way.. Similar passing range to Scholes (not on that level quite yet), has a bit of guile, like what Giggs offers in the centre. And he's pretty good defensively too. I think Carrick needs a man like that beside him, someone he knows is there to play passes to and vice-versa. It's all about partnerships these days.. especially when you're playing 2 men in midfield (and we need that to preserve our other partnership, Rooney and Hernandez). together, complementing each other, they can be more than 3 men who don't really work with eachother.
© © 2010- 2012 Can They Score. All Rights Reserved.
Still can't believe he doesn't get the recognition he rightfully deserves. He's transformed, and adapted, into a decent enough holding midfielder. In truth, we have missed his presence. Instead of self-discipline, we have Cleverley and Anderson leaving us exposed, which subsequently leads to teams creating chances against us, well, that's one of the main reasons, in my opinion. Thankfully, it's November, though, it's time to reintroduce Carrick back into the squad.